NewPoliticalSystem  Index  Home  New  Links Groups  

Local Needs For Affordable Housing

3.64 Thanet has suffered persistently high levels of unemployment, which impacts on ability to access decent housing. Income levels restrict many buyers to converted flats or older housing in need of repair. A 1997 Housing Needs and Empty Property survey of the District found that there is a clear affordability problem in the District for low-income households. It found some 1000 (net) concealed households, the majority of which look to be housed in the short term. 38.3% of concealed households had incomes below £10,000, and 61% below £12,500, and there were problems in accessing affordable property to people with incomes of £11,000 or below. Over 43% of concealed households were expected to require affordable rented housing. 400 of these households, earning over £15,000 were expected to be able to access low cost market housing, and the Study indicated that planning should aim to promote delivery of 400 low cost market housing units. A 1997 Housing Needs and Empty Property survey of Thanet found that there is a clear affordability problem in the District for low-income households. In 2002 Consultants were commissioned to undertake an updated Local Housing Needs Survey for Thanet. Emerging conclusions from this study show a very substantial level of unmet affordable housing need. The Study indicates that if all housing needs for affordable dwellings are to be met in the next 5 years then an additional 4,555 dwellings would be needed over that period. The Study notes that negotiating elements of affordable housing through planning powers is a significant source in addressing such need. It indicates that given the substantial level of need found in Thanet any target for negotiating elements of affordable housing would be perfectly justified. In the circumstances it recommends that negotiations should be triggered on the basis of a site threshold of 15+ dwellings/0.5 Hectares.

3.65 The District Council intends, through Policies H8 and H9 and HNP6, to encourage provision of a wider range and improved standards of affordable accommodation suitable to meet the needs of lower income groups. The term "affordable housing" embraces both low cost market housing and subsidised housing. In this respect, the Council regards the needs of those at present unable to obtain a satisfactory standard of accommodation through the private market as priority. However, the analysis in the udpated Local Needs Study indicates that low-cost market housing cannot meet any housing need whilst shared ownership might be able to help a small fraction of households in need (around 9%), and that for the remainder only social rented housing will be of any use. Thus the vast majority of need to be met is for social rented affordable housing. (In addition to H8, and H9 and HNP6, Policy H10 also applies to the rural settlements).

3.66 In respect of Policy H9, the District Council will normally seek to ensure that where affordable housing is provided it is made and kept available for those in need (normally households eligible for inclusion on the Council's housing needs register). Involvement of registered social landlords or other bona fide charitable bodies, whose continuing interest will secure this objective, will therefore be encouraged. While tenure will be a matter for negotiation, overriding local need is currently for rented housing, at affordable (non-market) rents (that is housing accessible to households whose income is insufficient to enable them to afford adequate housing locally on the open market). Arrangements to meet these needs will be particularly encouraged.

3.67 An affordable element of 15% 30% of total units will usually be expected in respect of Policy H9. (A specific exception being land allocated under Policy H1 at Manston Road allotments, Ramsgate, where 25% of the allocated site will be reserved for affordable social housing.) However, in assessing local need for additional affordable housing, the District Council will have regard to the current Housing Strategy and Investment Programme, the size and nature of the current housing needs register, and the number and proportion of affordable housing units available to accommodate local needs. Attention will be given to local market house prices and rents, local incomes, existing affordable housing supply, size and type of local households and the type of housing best suited to meet local needs.

3.68 Policies in this Plan relating to design quality and achieving attractive residential environments apply equally to affordable and market housing.

3.69 Regeneration of the town centres of Margate and Ramsgate is being promoted through a Town Centre and Empty Property Programme. This programme, supported by Single Regeneration Budget and European (ERDF) funding, English Heritage, Heritage Lottery Fund, Kent County Council and Thanet District Council and in co-ordination and partnership with a wide variety of investors, is delivering regeneration solutions. It aims to eradicate the urban decay impeding investment and regeneration in these centres. Quality affordable housing is a major driver of the programme, and land is being brought back into beneficial use for housing through close working with registered social landlords and private landlords. Quality affordable housing is also expected to be integrated within the proposed neighbourhood renewal programme for western Cliftonville (see paragraph 3.55 above).

3.70 The 1997 Housing Needs and Empty Property Survey identified strong demand for town centre housing. Within identified priority areas there is major scope for the provision of affordable housing as part of the overall regeneration strategy. This includes conversion of buildings back to their original use in a secondary commercial/mixed use area. Such locations are generally accessible on foot to a range of services. The programme forms an integral part of the Council’s Housing Strategy. The Council will, through its planning powers, encourage integration of affordable housing in all new housing developments. However, it will may also consider commuted payments in lieu of on-site provision, where this will facilitate provision of affordable housing contributing to the Town Centre & Empty Property Programme regeneration strategy or to other objectives of the Housing Strategy.

POLICY H8 – AFFORDABLE HOUSING

SUBJECT TO POLICY H1, PROPOSALS FOR NEW, CONVERTED OR REHABILITATED HOUSING WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE SUCH DEVELOPMENT:

(1) WOULD WIDEN ACCESS AND CHOICE AT THE LOW COST END OF THE HOUSING MARKET IN TERMS OF THE TYPE OF ACCOMMODATION AND TENURE;

OR

(2) WOULD DEMONSTRABLY MEET SOME LOCAL NEEDS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR EXAMPLE THROUGH INVOLVEMENT OF REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORDS.

POLICY H9 AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEGOTIATIONS ON LARGE HOUSING SITES

(1) WHERE DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED WHICH, IN ITS COMPLETED FORM, WOULD AMOUNT TO TWENTY-FIVE FIFTEEN OR MORE RESIDENTIAL UNITS, OR WILL/MIGHT REASONABLY FORM PART OF AN ON-GOING/FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, CUMULATIVELY TOTALLING TWENTY-FIVE FIFTEEN OR MORE SUCH UNITS, THE DISTRICT COUNCIL WILL NEGOTIATE WITH THE DEVELOPER FOR THE INCLUSION OF AN ELEMENT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING. SUCH NEGOTIATIONS WILL ALSO BE APPLIED TO ANY SITE OF 0.5 HECTARE OR MORE IRRESPECTIVE OF THE NUMBER OF DWELLINGS PROPOSED.

(2) THE WILLINGNESS OF THE DEVELOPER TO PROVIDE AN ELEMENT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING WILL BE A MATERIAL CONSIDERATION IN CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION.

(3) THE SCALE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING WHICH IS REASONABLE AND APPROPRIATE ON ANY PARTICULAR SITE WILL BE A MATTER FOR NEGOTIATION BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE DISTRICT COUNCIL, HOWEVER, AN ELEMENT OF 30% WILL REPRESENT THE STARTING POINT AND NEGOTIATIONS  AND WILL BE BASED ON THE INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA AND LOCAL NEEDS, AND BE SUBJECT TO A LEGAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TWO PARTIES.

(4) BEFORE GRANTING CONSENT THE DISTRICT COUNCIL WILL REQUIRE THE DEVELOPER TO DEMONSTRATE HOW ANY AFFORDABLE HOUSING WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO HOUSEHOLDS UNABLE TO OBTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSING THROUGH THE PRIVATE MARKET, AND THE COUNCIL MAY SEEK TO SECURE THIS BY ENTERING INTO A PLANNING AGREEMENT AND WILL REQUIRE THE DEVELOPER TO DEMONSTRATE THAT ENJOYMENT OF THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AS SUCH CAN BE GUARANTEED FOR SUCCESSIVE AS WELL AS INITIAL OCCUPIERS FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.

(5) IN THE EVENT THAT THE DEVELOPER WISHES TO LOCATE THE AFFORDABLE ELEMENT ON AN ALTERNATIVE SITE WITHIN HIS OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL, THIS WILL NORMALLY BE ACCEPTED PROVIDED THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT OF THE ALTERNATIVE SITE IS JUDGED ACCEPTABLE IN RELATION TO POLICY H1, AND SUBJECT TO A LEGAL AGREEMENT. ALTERNATIVELY, WHERE AN ALTERNATIVE SITE IS NOT AVAILABLE THE COUNCIL WILL MAY EXCEPTIONALLY CONSIDER A COMMUTED SUM IN LIEU OF DIRECT PROVISION WHERE THIS WILL FACILITATE PROVISION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONTRIBUTING TO THE OBJECTIVES OF THE HOUSING STRATEGY. ANY SUCH COMMUTED PAYMENT WILL BE EXPECTED TO INCORPORATE A PREMIUM REFLECTING ADDITIONAL PROFIT RESULTING FROM ACHIEVING THE DESIRED MARKET SCHEME ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE.

Operational Notes H8 & H9

(1) For the purposes of Policies H8 and H9, the definition of affordable housing is that contained in Circular 6/98 and includes both low cost market and subsidised housing.

(2) The size of site (25 15 units +) at which the District Council may negotiate for affordable housing, reflects the size and number of unidentified sites expected to come forward on which affordable housing provision is considered realistic. magnitude of local need in comparison to the total housing provisions in this Local Plan.

(3) An alternative site or commuted sum, as referred to in clause 5 of Policy H9, will not be an acceptable alternative in relation to the site allocated in Policy H2A, in order to provide for a mixed community at Westwood.

Elements of affordable housing encouraged/negotiated under the above Policies will make a valuable contribution in meeting outstanding needs for affordable housing. However, in view of the substantial amount of unmet need their impact will be limited, and the Council wishes to pursue all reasonable courses of action to offset it. In these circumstances the Council believes that some additional greenfield land release may be accepted where further affordable housing can be realised. The effect of the following policy is that proposals for schemes consisting solely of affordable housing at social rents may be accepted on greenfield sites adjoining the confines of Thanet’s Urban Area (as defined in Policy CC1). No market housing will be accepted on such sites, and land values will be expected to be kept at a level where additional affordable housing provision becomes feasible and cost effective. No sites are identified and all proposals will need to be weighed against other relevant local plan policies. Individual proposals will be considered against the criteria in the following policy.

HNP6 EXCEPTIONALLY, PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE NEW AFFORDABLE HOUSING (SOCIAL RENTED HOUSING ONLY) WHICH WILL ACCOMMODATE OUTSTANDING LOCAL NEEDS MAY BE PERMITTED AT SITES OUTSIDE, BUT ADJOINING, THE CONFINES OF THE URBAN AREA AS DEFINED IN POLICY CC1. NO MARKET HOUSING WILL BE PERMITTED UNDER THIS POLICY. AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE ALL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS CAN BE MET:

• THERE IS A REMAINING OUTSTANDING NEED FOR SOCIAL RENTED HOUSING

• THE APPLICANT CAN DEMONSTRATE THAT IT IS FEASIBLE TO PROVIDE SOCIAL RENTED HOUSING OF A SIZE AND TYPE THAT WILL MEET SUCH NEED. THIS MUST INCLUDE A FULL SCHEME FUNDING PACKAGE , EVIDENCE OF SUPPORT BY ANY PARTNERS AND DEMONSTRATE EFFECTIVE USE OF NON-MARKET LAND VALUES TO ACHIEVE A COST EFFECTIVE SCHEME

• THE APPLICANT CAN DEMONSTRATE THAT ENJOYMENT OF THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AS SUCH CAN BE GUARANTEED FOR SUCCESSIVE AS WELL AS INITIAL OCCUPIERS FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.

• THE PROPOSAL IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE FOURTH AND FIFTH CLAUSES OF POLICY H1.

NO SUCH PROPOSALS WILL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED GREEN WEDGES. THE IMPACT OF ALL PROPOSALS INCLUDING LOCATION AND SIZE WILL BE WEIGHED CAREFULLY IN RELATION TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT.

APPROPRIATE FINANCIAL AND TENURE ARRANGEMENTS WILL BE INCORPORATED IN A LEGAL AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNCIL;

Rural Local Needs Housing

3.71 The Village Appraisals carried out by the Parish Councils have shown that there is a modest shortage of affordable and suitable housing in the rural settlements to meet locally generated needs. This shortfall is most notable in respect of first-time buyers, young families and elderly residents within those settlements. A specific Housing Needs Survey for Minster Parish has provided evidence of existing need within that Parish, and this is addressed within Policy H2B.

3.72 The problem is not simply one of housing. The lack of housing to meet locally generated needs can have an adverse effect on the character, amenity and functioning of rural settlements. This tends to be most graphically illustrated when first-time buyers are effectively forced out of the villages because of the relatively high prices created within a restricted housing market.

3.73 This has far wider economic and social consequences than might initially be realised. Such outward movement often deprives villages of young families with children, putting village schools (an important point of social contact) at risk. In the long term, this has further implications for the provision of village services, and public transport and employment opportunities.

3.74 The Department of the Environment has recognised that such needs exist in rural areas in Planning Policy Guidance Note 3 (Housing), and the Kent Structure Plan also contains policies relating to rural housing development. For example, Policy RS2 allows exceptions to general policy considerations in respect of housing, where there is a special local justification.

3.75 In November 1989, the Kent Planning and Housing Officers Groups issued an Advisory Note on affordable local needs housing in rural areas, for use in the preparation of Local Plan policies. Its purpose was to establish a consistent countywide policy in respect of local needs housing. This Policy is based substantially on the model policy contained in the Advisory Note, with some adaptation to meet local conditions and circumstances.

3.76 The Policy reflects the District Council's commitment to the provision of local needs housing, which is also demonstrated by the District Council's continuing involvement in the DoE's Rural Housing Special Programme.

POLICY H10 RURAL LOCAL NEEDS HOUSING

EXCEPTIONALLY, PROPOSALS FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT TO MEET LOCAL NEEDS IN RURAL AREAS ON SITES OUTSIDE THE CONFINES OF THE RURAL SETTLEMENTS WILL BE PERMITTED, PROVIDED THAT ALL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS CAN BE MET:

(1) A DETAILED PARISH SURVEY, SUBMITTED WITH THE PLANNING APPLICATION, CLEARLY IDENTIFIES SUCH A NEED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DISTRICT PLANNING AUTHORITY, WHO WILL, IF NECESSARY, SEEK AN INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT;

 (2) THE LOCATION AND FORM OF DEVELOPMENT IS ACCEPTABLE IN TERMS OF ACCESS, PROXIMITY TO LOCAL SERVICES, ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE RURAL SETTLEMENT, INFRASTRUCTURE PROVISION AND IMPACT ON ITS BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND ON THE ADJOINING COUNTRYSIDE, AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT CONTROL CONSIDERATIONS;

(3) THE SUBMITTED PROPOSALS CONTAIN HOUSING OF A TYPE, MIX AND SCALE WHICH DIRECTLY MEET THE IDENTIFIED NEED;

(4) THE FIRST AND ALL SUBSEQUENT OCCUPIERS ARE RESTRICTED TO THE GROUPS SET OUT IN THE EXPLANATION BELOW;

(5) THE APPROPRIATE FINANCIAL AND TENURE ARRANGEMENTS, DETAILED IN THE PLANNING APPLICATION, HAVE BEEN MADE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF PARTS 3 AND 4 OF THIS POLICY, TO BE INCORPORATED IN A LEGAL AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNCIL;

(6) THE DISTRICT COUNCIL IS SATISFIED THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF PARTS 3, 4, AND 5 ARE BOTH ATTAINABLE, AND ENFORCEABLE IN THE LONG TERM (i.e. FOR BOTH INITIAL AND ALL SUBSEQUENT OCCUPIERS);

(7) THE PROPOSAL HAS THE SUPPORT OF THE RELEVANT PARISH COUNCIL; AND 

(8) THERE IS NO REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE MEANS OF MEETING THE IDENTIFIED NEED. 

THE DISTRICT COUNCIL WILL NOT NORMALLY SUPPORT PROPOSALS WHICH INCLUDE:

(a) MARKET HOUSING AS PART OF A CROSS-SUBSIDY SCHEME; OR

(b) LOW-COST HOUSING WHICH ONLY GIVES AN INITIAL ONE-TIME PURCHASE SUBSIDY.

Explanation:

3.77 For the purposes of this policy, local needs groups for whom such housing is considered appropriate are:

  1. First-time buyers who are already village residents or children of village residents;

  2. Village residents living in unsuitable accommodation;

  3. Dependants of village residents;

  4. People whose work is based in the village;

  5. People, normally the children of a household with local connections, who have been forced to move away from the village due to a lack of affordable or suitable housing.

3.78 For these purposes, a residential qualification is interpreted as 3 years continuous residence in the parish, or alternatively any 5 years out of the last 10. A household with local connections is defined as one having immediate family resident within the parish for a minimum of 10 years.

3.79 It is important that the client group and their particular design, financial and management requirements are clearly identified, since the District Council will expect the proposals to reflect these requirements.

3.80 The measures contained in this policy constitute a "control package" designed to ensure local needs housing is available to meet local needs in the long term. It is therefore essential that all the requirements set out in the Policy are met and detailed in the planning application, and that the applicant is willing to enter into a legal agreement to ensure these controls are established on a permanent basis.

New Agricultural Dwellings

3.81 Annexe I of PPG7 sets out the criteria by which proposals for new agricultural dwellings should be appraised. All such proposals should be subject to a "functional" test (whether an operational need for the dwelling exists). A "financial" test may also be applied in appropriate situations (whether the farmholding is sustainable in the long term as a productive agricultural unit).

3.82 Kent Structure Plan Policies aim to minimise the rate of new residential development in rural areas, relating it to locally generated needs, be they agricultural, forestry or social housing needs.

3.83 Planning permission will therefore normally only be granted for a farm dwelling where an agricultural need has been demonstrated. In this context, need means the need of the particular farm business, rather than the owner or occupier of the farm or holding.

3.84 The District Council takes the view that, in Thanet, agricultural need is directly related to the security of certain types of livestock, and horticultural produce. Thanet's agricultural land is almost exclusively in arable production which, by its nature, is not as susceptible to damage as other forms of agriculture.

3.85 The pattern of agricultural holdings in Thanet is well-established and stable, and the agricultural area is generally in close proximity to the urban areas. In view of this, the Council believes that there is, generally speaking, little justification for new agricultural dwellings.

POLICY H11 – NEW AGRICULTURAL DWELLINGS

THE PROVISION OF NEW AGRICULTURAL DWELLINGS IN THE DISTRICT WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED, WHERE IT IS DEMONSTRATED THAT:

(1) THERE IS A GENUINE SECURITY CONCERN WHICH NECESSITATES THAT PROVISION; OR

(2) A NEW VIABLE AGRICULTURAL UNIT REQUIRES ON-SITE ACCOMMODATION FOR OPERATIONAL PURPOSES; AND WHERE THE PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTABLE IN TERMS OF ACCESS, DESIGN AND LOCATION.

WHERE PLANNING PERMISSION FOR A NEW DWELLING IS GRANTED ON THE BASIS OF AGRICULTURAL REQUIREMENTS, A CONDITION OR LEGAL AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED TO RESTRICT OCCUPATION OF THE DWELLING TO AGRICULTURAL WORKERS AND THEIR DEPENDENTS, OR PERSONS LAST EMPLOYED IN AGRICULTURE.

Residential Care Homes

3.86 There is growing recognition that each area should seek to cater for its own elderly and handicapped and that such persons are best accommodated in the community. This is reflected in the Government policy document "Caring For People"(1989).

3.87 The 1991 Census indicates that at 3%, Thanet had the highest percentage of residents in communal establishments in Kent; the County total being 1.7%.

3.88 For many years the Council operated a policy of total restriction on new residential care homes which proved unacceptable and unworkable. This was replaced by a long and complicated policy relating largely to concentration, parking and amenity. Market forces and non land use considerations have lowered demand for new homes and it is considered that given the experience of the past and this current situation there is no necessity to address the situation with a specific policy and each application will be treated on its own merits. This situation will be monitored and kept under review with the intention of seeking a change of policy to prevent specific adverse consequences that would flow from an increase in the number of new residential homes proposed.

3.89 The social exclusion and deprivation suffered in the District is of significant concern to, and an important element to be tackled as part of, the District’s regeneration efforts. Adding to the problem is the impact of children’s homes in Thanet, attracted by low cost substantial properties and fuelled by high levels of fees for difficult children. Whilst sympathetic to the needs of such young people, the Council is concerned that large concentrations (almost 39% of East Kent Area’s "looked after children" were located in Thanet in 1999/2000) of such socially excluded young people will simply add to the problems of the area. There is also evidence that once imported into Thanet a large proportion of "looked after children" tend to remain in the district into adulthood, thereby compounding a dependency culture.

3.90 The Council is currently investigating, in conjunction with Kent Social Services and Kent Police, the significance and level of impact arising from such use. Following such investigations, the District Council will consider whether it is appropriate to formulate a specific policy for regulating the quantity or location of Children’s homes within the district through available planning powers.

3.91 The Council will consider the need to introduce policies regulating children’s homes in the light of available evidence regarding impact on local services, crime and disorder in the district, and the powers and resources of other relevant agencies to regulate and accommodate them.

Accommodation for Gypsies and Travelling Showpeople.

3.92 There is only occasional camping by gypsies in Thanet District. This can probably be attributed to lack of suitable employment opportunities and the fact that Thanet is not an "en route" stopping place. There is also anecdotal evidence that such visits are for leisure purposes. For these reasons, the District Council does not envisage a need to consider specific provision for accommodation for gypsies in the District. Any such applications in Thanet will be determined on their merits. The District Council is not aware of any local need for "Winter Quarters" or permanent bases for travelling showpeople.

Aircraft Noise

3.93 The District Council wishes to ensure that as far as possible, impact of aircraft noise on noise sensitive development including housing is limited to an acceptable level. The District Council's policies relating to aircraft noise in relation to all forms of noise sensitive development are contained in the Environmental Protection Chapter, (Policies EP7 and EP8). These Policies will be applicable in respect of applications for new residential development including residential conversion of existing buildings.

Extensions to Dwellings

3.94 Policy D4 of the Design chapter applies specifically to extensions to dwellings. Supplementary advice in respect of design of extensions to dwellings will be provided in a forthcoming House Extension Guide (which will be available from the District Council).

TARGETS

LP Implementation Target

Policy

 Area Location of New Housing Development

Relevant Policies

 H1

Indicator

 Percentage of new dwellings completed on previously developed land. 
(including conversion/re-use of existing buildings).

Target

 60% 70% of new dwellings should be provided on previously developed land

Monitoring

 Annual housing land study.

LP Implementation Target

Policy

 Area Efficient Use Of Housing Land.

Relevant Policies

 H1

Indicator

 Net densities achieved on completed housing sites over 10 units.

Target

 A minimum average density of 35 dwellings per hectare net in any one year

Monitoring

 Data derived from annual housing land survey.

LP Implementation Target

Policy

 Area Efficient Use of Housing Land

Relevant Policies

 H1 and H2A

Indicator

 Net density achieved on allocated housing site at Westwood (Policy H2A)

Target

 A minimum net density of 40 dwellings per hectare net.

Monitoring

 Number of dwellings completed on allocated sites.

LP Implementation Target

Policy

 Area Affordable Housing

Relevant Policies

 H9

Indicator

 % New housing sites over 25 15 units net or 0.5 hectares where provision is made
 for an element of affordable housing.

Target

 To secure provision for an element of affordable housing to meet outstanding local
 needs from all new housing sites of 25 15 or more dwellings or 0.5 hectares plus.

Monitoring

 Planning consents for new residential development of 25 or more units or 0.5 hectares
 which are subject to condition/agreement securing an element of affordable housing.

LP Implementation Target

Policy

 Area Affordable Housing

Relevant Policies

 H8, H9 HNP6 & H10

Indicator

 The number of affordable dwellings provided in Plan period

Target

 To report annually on actual number of affordable homes delivered.

Monitoring

 Affordable homes completed to standard ready for occupation and
 meeting local needs identified in Housing Need Study.

NEXT PAGE