NewPoliticalSystem  Index  Home  New  Links Groups  

11.1 This Chapter contains the District Council's planning policies as they relate to the villages in the district, including general levels of new development, service provision and other issues. Some topics which affect the villages are dealt with in more detail in other Chapters; for example, public open space (Sport & Recreation), employment sites (Economic Development), and Conservation Areas (Heritage).

11.2 Central Government advice as it relates to rural settlements is mainly contained in PPG7, although other PPGs also have relevance to rural areas. It indicates that the general planning approach in the countryside should be to support diversification of the rural economy, and to conserve the full and varied countryside for its own sake, and for the benefit and enjoyment of residents and visitors.

11.3 It goes on to say that maintaining a healthy rural economy is one of the best ways of protecting and improving the countryside.

11.4 One of the main aims of SERPLAN's "A New Strategy For The South East" is to encourage economic growth across the whole of the region, including the rural areas and settlements. This should not, however, conflict with another, and equally important objective; that of conserving and enhancing the countryside of the South East, and improving the appearance and perception of its towns and villages.

11.5 SERPLAN argues that land use policies should be responsive to local circumstances, including job requirements, affordable housing provision, availability of services, and the individual character of each settlement.

11.6 One of the aims of the Kent Structure Plan and the Kent Countryside Strategy is to enhance the character, quality and functioning of rural settlements in Kent, with the objective of securing a viable multi-purpose rural economy and balanced rural community, consistent with conserving the attractiveness and character of the countryside.

11.7 The Kent Structure Plan therefore gives flexibility to district planning authorities to formulate policies in respect of rural settlements, and to take account of local needs and circumstances in formulating settlement policies relating to housing provision, employment opportunities, services, recreational facilities, and tourism.

11.8 The District Council considers that new development should help to enhance the rural settlements of Thanet, not only in terms of quality of design, but also meeting the needs of the village, whether housing, employment opportunities, recreational facilities or other amenities.

11.9 One of the factors which has been considered in the development of Local Plan policies is the proximity of the rural settlements to Thanet's urban areas, and the reliance of the rural population on the towns for employment and services. A considerable proportion of rural dwellers both work and use services in the Thanet towns, and Canterbury and Dover. The level of car ownership in the villages also tends to be higher than in the towns.

11.10 The seven villages of Acol, Cliffs End, Manston, Minster, Monkton, St Nicholas and Sarre vary in a number of ways; scale, function, historic character, pattern of development, location relative to the towns, and so on. Each contributes something distinctive to the character of Thanet's rural area, and each has its own problems and future potential.

11.11 The District Council will, therefore, examine opportunities for improving the character, quality and functioning of those settlements.

11.12 The flexibility of the Structure Plan's Rural Settlement policies allows district planning authorities to designate certain villages for future growth under Policy RS3(a). Other villages would remain subject to Policy RS2 where restraint considerations apply, or even the strongly conservationist approach advocated by Policy RS3(b). This principle applies to housing, employment and all other forms of development subject to planning control.

11.13 The Village Appraisals carried out by Parish Councils during late 1989 and early 1990 indicate that modest growth is preferred by residents in most Parishes, with an emphasis on meeting locally generated needs. For example, there is general support for the provision of affordable housing and limited employment uses, to allow young people to stay in the village, and to enhance the living and working environment of Thanet's rural settlements.

Explanation:

11.14 The policy of the District Council is to concentrate new development in the Thanet towns, and to prevent levels of development in its rural settlements which might damage their character, amenity or functioning.

11.15 This Plan identifies sufficient land to meet expected requirements for housing land. In the short term, this does not necessitate the release of any additional land adjacent to Thanet’s existing rural settlements, other than at Minster where the range of services and the presence of a railway station makes a limited release of land for housing appropriate. The Council wishes to maintain the current pattern of development, in line with Kent County Council's rural settlement and conservation policies. 

11.16 The District Council does not consider that any of the Thanet villages are suitable for designation under Structure Plan Policy RS3, except Minster, which is identified under RS3(a). 

11.17 The village confines, as defined on the Village Insets accompanying the Proposals Map, therefore indicate the limits to new development in the various settlements. The only exception to this general approach would be where a local housing need is identified in line with Policy R4 H10 (It should be noted that the villages confines are designed to perform a purely land use planning function, and are not intended to define parishes, or have any other social implications).

11.18 The District Council has also given consideration to a possible role for new free-standing new settlements in meeting the housing requirement within the District. 

11.19 Government guidance contained in Planning Policy Guidance Note 3 indicates that new settlements should only be considered where the environmental and other benefits from such a settlement would outweigh those of the current practice of expanding existing towns and villages, and where such a settlement would not be in conflict with policies of restraint.

11.20 The District Council takes the view that the density of existing rural settlement, and the considerations in current Government advice, constitute major planning objections to the establishment of new settlements in Thanet. The proximity of Thanet's urban settlements strengthens this objection. The District Council will, however, keep this position under review in future local plans, in the light of the changing housing land supply situation.

11.21 There are a number of road frontage sites in the villages which provide outlook into the open countryside or onto other open spaces, or form an important break in the built environment of those villages.

11.22 The Council considers that such gaps are an important part of the built character of the villages, and should be protected as such. The following Policy will therefore apply in these situations. 

POLICY R2 VILLAGE GAPS

11.23 Village services are also under threat. This includes shops, schools, pubs, bus and other services. The Council wishes to support the continuation of as many village services as possible. For example, with the continued population growth at Minster, it is expected that an extension to the existing School will be required in the future, which would be supported by the Council. the extension to the existing school is welcomed.

11.24 The proximity of the villages to the urban areas and the high levels of car ownership mean that the continuation of such services is vulnerable to the operation of market forces. It may be that alternative voluntary methods of maintaining village services will need to be considered by the Parish Councils, in conjunction with Kent Rural Community Council.

Explanation:

11.25 One of the concerns expressed in the Village Appraisals is the continued loss of village services. While the District Council is not in a position to provide such services directly, it believes that it should play a facilitating role as Local Planning Authority for the private and voluntary sectors in terms of a positive planning approach to new retail and commercial opportunities of a suitable scale.

11.26 Village shops can provide a convenient and energy efficient source of shopping, fulfil a valuable social community function and contribute to the rural economy. Their viability will depend on customers continuing to use them,. however However, their loss can a have severe impact on the communities they serve. While trade protection is not a planning function, the District Council will use its powers to resist proposals which would threaten the viability of retention of a reasonable level of accessible shopping provision in the Thanet villages. In considering a reasonable level of shopping provision in relation to Policy R4, account will be taken of the size of the settlement and the community to be served. In addition to the following Policy, Policy R3 is also relevant.

11.27 There has been a consistent shortfall of land available for recreational purposes throughout the District. Some of the villages do have sufficient recreation land. However, Minster, Sarre and Cliffs End in particular suffer from a shortfall of such land, and the Local Plan seeks to address this situation.

11.28 Policies relating to village recreation land are contained in the Sport and Recreation Chapter of this Plan.

11.29 The enhancement of the built environment of the villages is clearly an important aspect of the overall rural economic and environmental strategy. The Policies contained in this Chapter seek to provide a basis on which to protect the built character of the villages.

11.30 In terms of positive enhancement, the Heritage Chapter gives policy and other guidance in respect of the enhancement of Conservation Areas in the District. The Kent Landscape and Nature Guidelines also provide a foundation for landscape and related improvement to key village sites.

11.31 For example, the Manston War Memorial is one of a number of village greens in Kent which have been identified in the Commons Registration Act 1965. Although a relatively small piece of land, it is still common land of unique character, the only such land in Thanet, which merits long-term protection.

11.32 Another aspect of rural diversification is the re-use of rural buildings. In recent years, many farm buildings have become redundant, in most cases because the buildings are of traditional construction and thus not suitable for modern farm machinery. Redundancy may also occur as a result of operational changes, farm rationalisation, or EU Common Agricultural Policy.

11.33 Central Government advice, as expressed in PPG7, is to support proposals for the conversion and re-use of such buildings wherever possible, to aid diversification of rural economy. The District Council has already given planning permission for a number of proposals of this kind, notably for residential or light industrial purposes. With parts of Thanet now included in the Rural Development Commission's Redundant Building Grant Scheme for the East Kent Coalfield, grant aid may now be available for the conversion of such buildings to new workspace.

11.34 Such conversions might be particularly desirable where buildings are listed, or have other landscape value, and their long term retention may be sought for these reasons.

11.35 However, it is in the interest of the character of the Thanet landscape not to permit the conversion of buildings which are not sympathetic to their landscape setting by reason of size, design or built form. The District Council will not normally support the conversion or adaption of such buildings.

11.36 Disused rural buildings may hold species protected by the Wildlife and Conservation Act 1981 and other legislation; for example, bats or Barn Owls. The conversion of such buildings should make provision for their continued use by protected species which are present. If this is not possible, an alternative roosting site should be provided nearby. This applies to Policies R5 and HE3.